From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meikle v. Office of Mayor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 26, 2019
Civ. No. 19-2439 (UNA) (D.D.C. Aug. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Civ. No. 19-2439 (UNA)

08-26-2019

MARCUS MEIKLE, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).

The plaintiff demands compensatory damages from the government of the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority for harms he allegedly has suffered because of lead in his drinking water. The complaint does not state a claim arising under the United States Constitution or federal law and, therefore, the plaintiff does not demonstrate federal question jurisdiction. Because the parties both are citizens of the District of Columbia, the plaintiff fails to establish diversity jurisdiction.

The Court will grant the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An Order is issued separately. DATE: August 26, 2019

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Meikle v. Office of Mayor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 26, 2019
Civ. No. 19-2439 (UNA) (D.D.C. Aug. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Meikle v. Office of Mayor

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS MEIKLE, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Aug 26, 2019

Citations

Civ. No. 19-2439 (UNA) (D.D.C. Aug. 26, 2019)