From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meija v. Intellipure, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 28, 2022
22-CV-3569 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-3569 (VSB)

06-28-2022

RICHARD MEIJA, Plaintiff, v. INTELLIPURE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff filed this action on May 3, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On June 14, 2022, Plaintiff returned a summons indicating that Defendant had been served on May 31, 2022. (Doc. 5.) Defendant's response to Plaintiff's complaint was thus due on June 21, 2022. (Id.) Defendant has yet to appear in this action. Plaintiff, however, has taken no action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff must seek default judgment in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than July 22, 2022. If Plaintiff fails to do so or otherwise demonstrates that he does not intend to prosecute, I will dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Meija v. Intellipure, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 28, 2022
22-CV-3569 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Meija v. Intellipure, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD MEIJA, Plaintiff, v. INTELLIPURE, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 28, 2022

Citations

22-CV-3569 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2022)