From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meier v. Berger

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
Sep 27, 2018
No. 336946 (Mich. Ct. App. Sep. 27, 2018)

Opinion

No. 336946

09-27-2018

DANIEL LUKE MEIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMANDA MEGAN BERGER and ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Wayne Circuit Court
LC No. 16-006718-NI Before: CAVANAGH, P.J., and STEPHENS and SWARTZLE, JJ. STEPHENS, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I write to concur with the majority on all issues except as to the dismissal for failure to provide discovery. I would find that failure to address the Duray standards leaves this Court to speculate as to the trial court's reasons to exercise the extraordinary and draconian sanction of dismissal for failure to provide discovery. Duray Dev, LLC v Perrin, 288 Mich App 143, 165; 792 NW2d 749 (2010). However, since the complaint was properly dismissed under MCR 2.116(C)(7), that error does not warrant reversal.

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens


Summaries of

Meier v. Berger

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
Sep 27, 2018
No. 336946 (Mich. Ct. App. Sep. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Meier v. Berger

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LUKE MEIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMANDA MEGAN BERGER and…

Court:STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Sep 27, 2018

Citations

No. 336946 (Mich. Ct. App. Sep. 27, 2018)