Meidinger v. United States

2 Citing cases

  1. Downey v. United States

    No. 19-1707C (Fed. Cl. Jun. 4, 2021)

    Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378, 379 (Fed. Cir. 1994); Stanwyck v. United States, 127 Fed.Cl. 308, 313 (2016). And while a bounty for information that leads to IRS recoveries might be mandated by federal law, see Meidinger v. United States, 989 F.3d 1353, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2021) (citing 26 U.S.C. § 7623), the court with jurisdiction over such matters is the U.S. Tax Court, not ours, Meidinger, 989 F.3d at 1358; 26 U.S.C. § 7623(b)(4)---and in any event, Mr. Downey's complaint is not that he failed to receive a percentage of any such proceeds, but that his tips were ignored. See Compl. at 6.

  2. Tindall v. United States

    No. 2023-1139 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2023)

    ); see Meidinger v. United States, 989 F.3d 1353, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2021); Li, 22 F.4th at 1016. Mr. Tindall's Tax Court claim assertedly arose under § 7623(b).