From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mei v. DP Hosp. Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 13, 2019
19-CV-3309 (AJN) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2019)

Opinion

19-CV-3309 (AJN) (JLC)

11-13-2019

CHUNHONG MEI, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DP HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge.

WHEREAS, the parties came before the undersigned for a settlement conference today and reached a settlement; and

WHEREAS, the parties have now consented to the undersigned's jurisdiction over this matter for all purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c);

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties are directed to file a joint letter motion along with their settlement agreement no later than December 13, 2019 to request court approval. The letter motion should explain why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and otherwise comply with the Second Circuit's decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The parties are directed to this Court's rulings in Cruz v. Relay Delivery, Inc., 17-CV-7475 (JLC), 2018 WL 4203720 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 4, 2018) (no reemployment provision impermissible and provision related to communication with media should not be overly restrictive); Rivera v. Relay Delivery, Inc., 17-CV-5012 (JLC), 2018 WL 1989618 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2018) (release that was broader and thus more favorable to defendants than plaintiff's narrower release was impermissible): Howard v. Don Coleman Advertising, Inc., 16-CV-5060 (JLC), 2017 WL 773695 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2017) (mutual non-disparagement provision must include carve-out for truthfulness); and Souza v. 65 St. Marks Bistro, 15-CV-327 (JLC), 2015 WL 7271747 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 6, 2015) (regarding impermissible confidentiality provisions and the proper scope of mutual general releases), for further guidance as to permissible and impermissible terms.

For recent settlement papers that the Court has approved, the parties are directed to the following cases, as examples: Rodriguez v. Emenike, No. 18-CV-5786 (Dkt. Nos. 36, 38 (settlement agreement); Dkt. No. 37 (court approval order)); Yahuiti v. L Ray LLC, No. 19-CV-1114 (Dkt. No. 24 (settlement agreement); Dkt. No. 25 (court approval order)); De Luna Hernandez v. City Catering, No. 18-CV-3919 (Dkt. No. 49 (settlement agreement); Dkt. No. 50 (court approval order)); and Sanchez v. New York Kimchi Catering Corp., No. 16-7784 (Dkt. No. 98 (settlement agreement) and Dkt. No. 99 (court approval order).

SO ORDERED. Dated: November 13, 2019

New York, New York

/s/_________

JAMES L. COTT

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Mei v. DP Hosp. Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 13, 2019
19-CV-3309 (AJN) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Mei v. DP Hosp. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:CHUNHONG MEI, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 13, 2019

Citations

19-CV-3309 (AJN) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2019)