From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mehmood v. U.S. Marshal's Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P

03-12-2015

YASIR MEHMOOD, Plaintiff, v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a federal pretrial detainee, was recently transferred from the Sacramento County Main Jail to the Wayne Brown Correctional Facility in Nevada City, California. Prior to his transfer, the court ordered service of plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (FAC) on two Sacramento jail officials, Andris and Toliver. (ECF No. 9.) Both are sued in their official capacity for injunctive relief only. (See id.)

Plaintiff has filed a motion to "amend the relief sought in the FAC. (ECF No. 10.) In addition to injunctive relief, he would like to seek compensatory damages for the weight loss and "mental and emotional injuries" he suffered as a result of his jail-provided diet. (Id.) In fact, as a result of his transfer, his request for injunctive relief against Andris and Toliver is moot. Generally, when an inmate seeks injunctive or declaratory relief concerning the prison where he is incarcerated, his claims for such relief become moot when he is no longer subjected to those conditions. Nelson v. Heiss, 271 F.3d 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2001); Dilley v. Gunn, 64 F.3d 1365, 1368 (9th Cir.1995); Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.2d 517, 519 (9th Cir. 1991).

Under Local Rule 220, plaintiff cannot amend the FAC by simply "tacking on" a new type of relief. Thus the court will deny plaintiff's motion. However, given his changed circumstances, he may file an amended complaint for screening.

Plaintiff has also requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiffs request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to amend relief (ECF No. 10) is denied;

2. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 11) is denied; and

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint. Dated: March 12, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2 / mehm2075.ord


Summaries of

Mehmood v. U.S. Marshal's Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Mehmood v. U.S. Marshal's Service

Case Details

Full title:YASIR MEHMOOD, Plaintiff, v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2015

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2015)