From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mehl v. Green

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 8, 2021
2:21-cv-01861-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01861-TLN-JDP (PS)

12-08-2021

GAVIN MEHL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WARREN GREEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

ECF NO. 7

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss or to strike the complaint. ECF No. 7. Defendants argue that the complaint does not plead sufficiently detailed or specific factual allegations and is, therefore, defective for failing to articulate a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). Plaintiffs have now filed an amended complaint. ECF No. 16. Without expressing any view as to its merits, the court dismisses defendants' motion to dismiss without prejudice. Defendants are directed to either answer the new complaint or file a new motion, as appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mehl v. Green

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 8, 2021
2:21-cv-01861-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Mehl v. Green

Case Details

Full title:GAVIN MEHL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WARREN GREEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01861-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)