From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Megginson v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 3, 2022
22 Civ 0051 (JGK) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ 0051 (JGK) (GWG)

11-03-2022

MICHAEL E. MEGGINSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants.


ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The City has failed to file the status report it indicated it would file by October 31, 2022, in its letter dated September 15, 2022. See Docket # 34. In light of the fact that the stay of the time to answer the complaint was based on the City's purported need to investigate the incident (see Docket # 21), and in light of the lengthy time period that has elapsed since the stay was first requested, the Court now sets a deadline of November 17, 2022, for all named defendants to respond to the complaint. Those defendants are the City of New York, C.O. Rhooms, Captain Cesar, and Captain Christian, all of whom have waived service. See Docket ## 14, 15, 32.

The Court reminds plaintiff that the City has been unable to identify the defendant named as “John Doe” based on the plaintiff's description. See Letter dated August 1, 2022 (Docket # 31). Thus, the case will not proceed as to that defendant unless an identification is made in the future.

Finally, the plaintiff's address (Docket # 33) has been incorrectly transcribed on the docket sheet. The address should read as follows:

2751 Briggs Ave
Bronx, NY 10458.

The Clerk is requested to change the address to the above.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Megginson v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 3, 2022
22 Civ 0051 (JGK) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Megginson v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. MEGGINSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

22 Civ 0051 (JGK) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2022)