From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meenan v. Newman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 13, 1995
662 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-1887.

November 1, 1995. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1995.

Herman, Roof, Henry Gordon and Stephen L. Roof and Jeffrey S. Grubman, Miami, David Rich, Margate, and Warren Trazenfeld, Miami, for petitioners.

Silver Garvett and Scott A. Silver, Coconut Grove, for respondents.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.


The order of reference to a special master without consent of opposing parties was explicitly contrary to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). For this reason, prohibition is granted so as to prevent respondents from further enforcing the order of reference. Moreover, we grant mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine the matters encompassed in the order of reference. Rosen v. Solomon, 586 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We assume issuance of a formal writ will not be necessary.

Relief awarded.


Summaries of

Meenan v. Newman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 13, 1995
662 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Meenan v. Newman

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. MEENAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 13, 1995

Citations

662 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Rosenberg v. Morales

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c) is very clear that the trial court cannot refer matters to a special…

Rosenberg v. Morales

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c) is very clear that the trial court cannot refer matters to a special…