From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meeks v. Precythe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Jan 14, 2020
ACTION NO. 2:18cv410 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2020)

Opinion

ACTION NO. 2:18cv410

01-14-2020

BERNARD MEEKS, #29644, Petitioner, v. ANNE L. PRECYTHE, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, and MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner, Bernard Meeks, has submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Meeks is currently incarcerated in Jefferson City Correctional Center in Jefferson City, Missouri. ECF No. 1 at 1. Meeks, who was previously convicted and sentenced in Virginia, asserts the state of Virginia has violated his constitutional rights by filing a detainer in Missouri. ECF No. 1 at 2, 8-9.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 536(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 72 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for report and recommendation. The report and recommendation, filed October 15, 2019, recommends that the respondent Attorney General of Virginia's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 24, be granted, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, be denied and dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 32.

Meeks was advised of his right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The Court has received no objections to the report and recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired.

The Court does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the report and recommendation. It is, therefore, ORDERED that respondent Attorney General of Virginia's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 24, be GRANTED, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Finding that the basis for dismissal of Meeks' section 2254 petition is not debatable, and alternatively finding that Meeks has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see Rules Gov. § 2254 Cases in U.S. Dist. Cts. 11(a); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-85 (2000).

Meeks is ADVISED that, because a certificate of appealability is denied by this Court, he may seek a certificate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Rules Gov. § 2254 Cases in U.S. Dist. Cts. 11(a). If Meeks intends to seek a certificate of appealability from the Fourth Circuit, he must do so within thirty (30) days from the date of this Final Order. Meeks may seek such a certificate by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to Meeks and counsel of record for respondent.

/s/_________

Mark S. Davis

Chief United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia January 14, 2020


Summaries of

Meeks v. Precythe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Jan 14, 2020
ACTION NO. 2:18cv410 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Meeks v. Precythe

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD MEEKS, #29644, Petitioner, v. ANNE L. PRECYTHE, Director of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

Date published: Jan 14, 2020

Citations

ACTION NO. 2:18cv410 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2020)