From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meegan v. Cox

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 18, 2015
No. 67384 (Nev. Feb. 18, 2015)

Opinion

No. 67384

02-18-2015

JAMES FRANCIS MEEGAN, II, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR JAMES G. COX, NDOC; NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, petition for a writ of prohibition. Petitioner challenges parole revocation proceedings, the decision to return him to Nevada, and the decision to revoke his parole. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330. Notably, petitioner previously challenged the parole revocation proceedings and the decision to revoke parole in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Warden v. Meegan, II, Docket No. 66775 (Order of Reversal and Remand, February 11, 2015). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: James Francis Meegan, II

Attorney General/Carson City


Summaries of

Meegan v. Cox

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 18, 2015
No. 67384 (Nev. Feb. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Meegan v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FRANCIS MEEGAN, II, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR JAMES G. COX, NDOC…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 18, 2015

Citations

No. 67384 (Nev. Feb. 18, 2015)