From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mee Yung Park v. Lucente

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 29, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1154 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-29-2017

In the Matter of MEE YUNG PARK, appellant, v. Anthony Michael LUCENTE, respondent.

Mee Yung Park, Charlotte, NC, appellant pro se.


Mee Yung Park, Charlotte, NC, appellant pro se.

Appeal by the mother from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Jeffrey Arlen Spinner, J.), dated May 23, 2016. The order denied the mother's petition for custody of the subject child and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother surrendered her parental rights to the subject child before she filed the instant custody petition. Thus, at the time she filed the instant petition, the mother was not a person entitled to seek custody of the child (see Matter of Adam S., 287 A.D.2d 723, 724, 732 N.Y.S.2d 418 ; Matter of Santosky v. Roach, 161 A.D.2d 908, 908–909, 557 N.Y.S.2d 473 ). Accordingly, the Family Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding (see Matter of Santosky v. Roach, 161 A.D.2d at 908–909, 557 N.Y.S.2d 473 ).

DILLON, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mee Yung Park v. Lucente

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 29, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1154 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Mee Yung Park v. Lucente

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MEE YUNG PARK, appellant, v. Anthony Michael LUCENTE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 29, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1154 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
49 N.Y.S.3d 312

Citing Cases

Mehmeti v. Dautaj

The petitioner appeals. A biological parent whose parental rights have been terminated is not entitled to…

Mehmeti v. Dautaj

The petitioner appeals. A biological parent whose parental rights have been terminated is not entitled to…