From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medway v. Cate

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 6, 2011
EDCV 11-184-ODW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2011)

Opinion


SAMUEL LEE MEDWAY, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, WARDEN, et al., Respondents. No. EDCV 11-184-ODW (PJW) United States District Court, C.D. California. June 6, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

          OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).


Summaries of

Medway v. Cate

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 6, 2011
EDCV 11-184-ODW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Medway v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LEE MEDWAY, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, WARDEN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 6, 2011

Citations

EDCV 11-184-ODW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2011)