From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medure v. Zweibel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2013
102 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-01-24

In re Gary MEDURE, Petitioner, v. Hon. Ronald ZWEIBEL, et al., Respondent.

Siriano & Bernstein, P.C., Bronx (Anthony F. Siriano of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for Hon. Ronald Zweibel, respondent.


Siriano & Bernstein, P.C., Bronx (Anthony F. Siriano of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for Hon. Ronald Zweibel, respondent.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Richard Nahas of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

ANDRIAS, J.P., SAXE, MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Medure v. Zweibel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2013
102 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Medure v. Zweibel

Case Details

Full title:In re Gary MEDURE, Petitioner, v. Hon. Ronald ZWEIBEL, et al., Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

102 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 391
957 N.Y.S.2d 865