From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medley v. Runnels

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 30, 2007
486 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-55295.

Filed April 30, 2007.

Theodore Beech Medley, Vacaville, CA, pro se.

Wayne R. Young, Santa Monica, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Robert M. Foster, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it. is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel unpublished disposition shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.


Summaries of

Medley v. Runnels

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 30, 2007
486 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Medley v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:Theodore Beech MEDLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 30, 2007

Citations

486 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Medley v. Runnels

After a three-judge panel of this court affirmed in a memorandum disposition, we granted re-hearing en…