From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MedioStream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
CASE NO.: C-11-03095-RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: C-11-03095-RMW

03-21-2013

MEDIOSTREAM, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

This matter came on regularly for a motion hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss on December 2, 2011. The court issued a written ruling granting the motion to dismiss with leave to amend on April 23, 2012. An amended complaint was to be filed by May 23, 2012. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties appear on April 26, 2013 @ 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 6 of this Court and show cause WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED for failure to diligently prosecute.

FAILURE TO APPEAR, THE CASE WILL BE DISMISSED.

_______________

RONALD M. WHYTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copy of Order E-Filed to Counsel of Record:


Summaries of

MedioStream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
CASE NO.: C-11-03095-RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

MedioStream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MEDIOSTREAM, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: C-11-03095-RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)