From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2003
303 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-01848

March 21, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mintz, J.), entered April 22, 2002, which granted defendant's motion to reargue and, upon reargument, dismissed the third, fourth and fifth causes of action.

PHILLIPS, LYTLE, HITCHCOCK, BLAINE HUBER LLP, BUFFALO (PAUL MORRISON-TAYLOR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

GOLDBERG SEGALLA, LLP, BUFFALO (JULIE P. APTER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, SCUDDER, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the third, fourth and fifth causes of action and reinstating those causes of action and as modified the order is affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Medina v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. ([appeal No. 1] 303 A.D.2d 987 [Mar. 21, 2003]).


Summaries of

Medina v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2003
303 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Medina v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHERYL MEDINA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 921