From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 17, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-02240-WBS-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-02240-WBS-DAD P

12-17-2012

ERNEST DANIEL MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. JAMAL J. SINGH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 16, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2012, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's August 3, 2012 motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 31) is denied.

____________________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Medina v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 17, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-02240-WBS-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Medina v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST DANIEL MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. JAMAL J. SINGH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 17, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-02240-WBS-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2012)