From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. Nolan

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 8, 2023
2:23-cv-538-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-538-JHC

06-08-2023

MARIA ELENA HERNANDEZ MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE NOLAN, et al., Defendants.

NICHOLAS W. BROWN United States Attorney MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Attorneys for Defendants KATHERINE H. RICH, WSBA#46881 Rich Immigration PC Attorney for Plaintiff


NICHOLAS W. BROWN

United States Attorney

MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

Attorneys for Defendants

KATHERINE H. RICH, WSBA#46881

Rich Immigration PC

Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE ANSWER DEADLINE AND ORDER

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff and Defendants, through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 10(g) and 16, jointly stipulate and move for a thirty-day extension of the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint and file the certified administrative record. Plaintiff brings this case pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and Mandamus Act seeking an order compelling the Government to complete processing of adjudicate Plaintiff's Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility. The response to the Complaint is currently due on or before June 12, 2023.

A court may modify a deadline for good cause. Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b). Continuing pretrial and trial dates is within the discretion of the trial judge. See King v. State of California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986).

The parties submit there is good cause for an extension of the answer deadline. Defendants contend that this case should be reviewed on the administrative record and is exempt from the initial disclosure requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. LCR 79(h) requires Defendants to file the administrative record with the answer. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) is currently assembling the administrative record but needs additional time due to technical issues. USCIS believes that 30 days will allow it to complete assembly of the certified administrative record. This is the first request for an extension of a deadline in this case.

Accordingly, the parties jointly stipulate and propose that Defendants' respond to the Complaint and file the Certified Administrative Record on or before July 12, 2023.

I certify that this memorandum contains 265 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules.

ORDER

The parties having stipulated and agreed, it is hereby so ORDERED. Defendants shall file the response to the Complaint and the certified administrative record on or before July 12, 2023.


Summaries of

Medina v. Nolan

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 8, 2023
2:23-cv-538-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Medina v. Nolan

Case Details

Full title:MARIA ELENA HERNANDEZ MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE NOLAN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jun 8, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-538-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 8, 2023)