From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 11, 2011
No. 2: 11-cv-0857 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2: 11-cv-0857 KJN P.

May 11, 2011


ORDER AND FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed April 1, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this action; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 10, 2011


Summaries of

Medina v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 11, 2011
No. 2: 11-cv-0857 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Medina v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:ALEX MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. M. McDONALD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 11, 2011

Citations

No. 2: 11-cv-0857 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)