From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00413-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00413-SKO PC

10-11-2011

NORBERTO MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD


(Doc. 33)

On October 6, 2011, Plaintiff Norberto Medina, a state prisoner proceeding who was proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed a motion seeking transmittal of the record to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Fed. R. App. P. 10(a).

Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Rules, Plaintiff, as a pro se litigant, is not required to file an excerpt of the record. Circuit Rule 30-1.2. Plaintiff's motion is therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Medina v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00413-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Medina v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:NORBERTO MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00413-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)