From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. Cramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 27, 2007
No. CIV S-06-2534 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2534 LKK GGH P.

March 27, 2007


ORDER


A joint scheduling statement in this matter was filed on March 6, 2007, pursuant to the court's order filed December 4, 2006, the parties having been granted a subsequent extension of time. After reviewing the joint statement, the court issues the following ORDERS:

1. Should petitioner elect to proceed on the original petition, petitioner must so inform the court, as well as file any supplemental memorandum of points and authorities on or before May 4, 2007;

2. Should petitioner elect to proceed upon an amended petition of exhausted claims only, petitioner must file the amended petition on or before May 4, 2007.

3. If petitioner proceeds as set forth either under no. 1 or no. 2 above, respondent must file an answer or dispositive motion within 60 days thereafter; petitioner must file any reply or opposition, as appropriate, within 30 days of service of respondent's responsive pleading; if respondent filed a motion, respondent will have 15 days after service of an opposition to file a reply.

4. Should petitioner identify unexhausted claims which petitioner will seek to exhaust, petitioner shall file an amended petition, on or before May 4, 2007, setting forth all claims, exhausted and unexhausted, and shall demonstrate good cause for having failed to exhaust state court remedies as to any claim which petitioner would seek to exhaust. Petitioner shall move the court to hold the proceedings in abeyance pending exhaustion of state court remedies as to the unexhausted claims, on or before May 4, 2007; if a stay is ultimately granted, petitioner must immediately pursue state court exhaustion, that is, within 30 days of the granting of a stay, and, upon said exhaustion in state court, within 30 days, proceed upon the amended petition in federal court.

5. Should respondent object to any motion for a stay of proceedings by petitioner to pursue unexhausted claims, respondent must file any opposition to such a motion within 30 days of service thereof; thereafter, petitioner has 15 days to file any reply.

6. If petitioner intends to make a motion for leave to conduct discovery under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 6(a), petitioner must do so by no later than May 4, 2007; if respondent opposes any such motion respondent must do so within 30 days thereafter; petitioner's reply, if any, must be filed within 15 days of any opposition by respondent.

7. If petitioner chooses to move for an evidentiary hearing, petitioner must do so at the earliest appropriate opportunity; should petitioner file a motion for an evidentiary hearing, respondent must file any opposition within 30 days of service of the motion, and petitioner must file any reply within 15 days of service of any opposition.


Summaries of

Medina v. Cramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 27, 2007
No. CIV S-06-2534 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Medina v. Cramer

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO PEREZ MEDINA, Petitioner, v. M. CRAMER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 27, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2534 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)