Opinion
No. 949.
June 30, 2009.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered April 17, 2008, which dismissed plaintiffs complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Rawlins Gibbs, LLP, New York (Earl A. Rawlins of counsel), for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
The commencement of this action was untimely (General Municipal Law § 50-i). Plaintiffs objection that defendant's answer should be considered a nullity was effectively waived when he retained that responsive pleading for two months before moving to dismiss ( see e.g. Rosenshein v Ernstoff, 176 AD2d 686). He also failed to offer any evidence that defendant had induced him to delay bringing the action by misleading him into believing settlement negotiations were imminent. There are no grounds for estopping defendant from asserting the statute of limitations ( see e.g. Dowdell v Greene County, 14 AD3d 750; Dailey v Mazel Stores, 309 AD2d 661, 663-664).