From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. All American Bus Lines

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 29, 1945
152 F.2d 61 (5th Cir. 1945)

Opinion

No. 11462.

November 29, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; Charles A. Boynton, Judge.

Action by Luz M. Medina, individually and as next friend, against All American Bus Lines, Inc., for damages for injuries resulting in death of decedent when defendant's bus, while allegedly attempting to pass decedent's truck, collided therewith. From a judgment for defendant on an order granting defendant's motion for a directed verdict, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

E.B. Elfers, of El Paso, Tex., for appellant.

J.F. Hulse, of El Paso, Tex., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, WALLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.


The suit was for damages for injuries resulting in death. The claim was that plaintiff's decedent had come to his death as a result of the negligent operation of defendant's bus. At the conclusion of plaintiff's evidence, a motion for directed verdict was made and granted. Plaintiff is here insisting that, though the evidence was entirely circumstantial, it was sufficient to make an issue for the jury. Appellee insists that the evidence shows no more than that there was an accident, and that under settled law the proof that an accident occurred is not proof that it was negligently caused. It insists further that while negligence may be proved by circumstantial evidence, the authorities settle it that the circumstances must be such that an inference of negligence is not purely speculative in its nature.

Texas P.R. v. Shoemaker, 98 Tex. 451, 84 S.W. 1049; Webster v. Henwood, Tex.Civ.App., 134 S.W.2d 333; Lipscomb v. Houston Elec. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W.2d 1042.

Texas N.O.R. v. Warden, 125 Tex. 193, 78 S.W.2d 164; Doggett v. Peck, 5 Cir., 116 F.2d 273; Interstate Circuit v. Le Normand, 5 Cir., 100 F.2d 160; Nash v. Raun, 3 Cir., 149 F.2d 885.

We agree with appellee's statement of the law, and a page by page search of the record leaves in no doubt that the evidence showed no more than that a collision occurred, its causes completely unexplained. In this state of the record, a directed verdict for defendant was demanded. The judgment was right. It is affirmed.


Summaries of

Medina v. All American Bus Lines

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 29, 1945
152 F.2d 61 (5th Cir. 1945)
Case details for

Medina v. All American Bus Lines

Case Details

Full title:MEDINA v. ALL AMERICAN BUS LINES, Inc

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 29, 1945

Citations

152 F.2d 61 (5th Cir. 1945)

Citing Cases

Secanti v. Jones

" Other cases in which the rule has been applied include the following: Whelpley v. Frye, Adm'x, 199 Or. 530,…

Paddock v. Tone

" In Medina v. All American Bus Lines, Inc., 152 F.2d 61, the Federal circuit court of appeals for the fifth…