From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina Esparza v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 10, 2022
No. 31939-21L (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2022)

Opinion

31939-21L

06-10-2022

MARIA PERLA ALEJANDRA MEDINA ESPARZA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On May 10, 2022, respondent filed a motion for leave to file first amended answer and concurrently lodged a first amended answer. Paragraph 8 of respondent's first amended answer contains affirmative allegations. Although the Court directed petitioner file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion, no response has been received from petitioner.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's above-referenced motion is granted and the first amended petition shall be filed as of the date of service of this Order.

Petitioner is advised that Rule 37(a), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, provides that, with respect to the affirmative allegations contained in respondent's first amended answer, petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of service within which to move or 45 days from the date of service within which to file a reply. Rule 37(b) addresses the proper form and content of the reply to the affirmative allegations.


Summaries of

Medina Esparza v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 10, 2022
No. 31939-21L (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Medina Esparza v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:MARIA PERLA ALEJANDRA MEDINA ESPARZA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 10, 2022

Citations

No. 31939-21L (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2022)