From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 2, 1995
657 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2075.

August 2, 1995.

Appeal from order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Richard B. Burk, Judge.

Michael Dubiner of Dubiner Blumberg, P.A., Boynton Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


OPINION ON REHEARING


We withdraw our previous per curiam affirmance and substitute the following opinion.

The state concedes having stipulated that the defendant should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty to the violation of probation. Thus, the undisputed evidence that the state breached its stipulation to allow appellant to vacate his plea to the probation violation requires reversal of the denial of defendant's 3.850 motion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 2, 1995
657 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Meder v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MEDER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 2, 1995

Citations

657 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)