From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medardi v. Huaman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 10, 2022
335 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 4D21-1080

03-10-2022

Tina MEDARDI, Appellant, v. Alberto Angel HUAMAN, Appellee.

Jonathan R. O'Boyle of The O'Boyle Law Firm, P.C., Deerfield Beach, for appellant. Brian C. Valentine of The Law Office of MosierValentine, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Jonathan R. O'Boyle of The O'Boyle Law Firm, P.C., Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

Brian C. Valentine of The Law Office of MosierValentine, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Warner, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Medardi v. Huaman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 10, 2022
335 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Medardi v. Huaman

Case Details

Full title:Tina MEDARDI, Appellant, v. Alberto Angel HUAMAN, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 10, 2022

Citations

335 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)