From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mecum v. Tievoli Partnership, LTD

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division
Feb 13, 2001
35 S.W.3d 456 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 76945

November 14, 2000 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 9, 2001. Application for Transfer Denied February 13, 2001.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PIKE COUNTY, HON. FRED RUSH.

Ross Harry Briggs, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.

Charles E. Rendlen III, Law Office of Rendlen, Rendlen Bastian, Hannibal, MO, for respondents.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Richard B. Teitelman, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

ORDER



Tievoli Partnership, Ltd., et al., (Appellants) appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding that Appellants had fraudulently induced Kenneth Mecum, et al., (Respondents) to enter into an agreement to purchase an interest in a certain resort property.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mecum v. Tievoli Partnership, LTD

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division
Feb 13, 2001
35 S.W.3d 456 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Mecum v. Tievoli Partnership, LTD

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH MECUM, et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. TIEVOLI PARTNERSHIP…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division

Date published: Feb 13, 2001

Citations

35 S.W.3d 456 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)