From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meckler v. Bergstol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 1976
53 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

June 21, 1976


In an action inter alia to enjoin defendants from utilizing certain building plans and drawings, the corporate plaintiff and the defendants cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered March 17, 1976, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment. Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision denying the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment and by substituting therefor a provision to the effect that the said cross motion is granted. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see Wright v Eisle, 86 App. Div. 356). We do not agree with the holding in Shaw v Williamsville Manor ( 38 A.D.2d 442). Martuscello, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meckler v. Bergstol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 1976
53 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Meckler v. Bergstol

Case Details

Full title:JEROME I. MECKLER et al., Respondents, and KANAJE CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1976

Citations

53 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)