From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mechtronics Corp. v. Kirchhoff-Consigli Construction Management, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 2, 2016
144 A.D.3d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-02-2016

In the Matter of MECHTRONICS CORPORATION, appellant, v. KIRCHHOFF–CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, LLC, respondent.

John G. Fellinger, New York, NY, for appellant. Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, Albany, NY (James J. Barriere and Chad J. Caplan of counsel), for respondent.


John G. Fellinger, New York, NY, for appellant.

Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, Albany, NY (James J. Barriere and Chad J. Caplan of counsel), for respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated June 19, 2014, which denied the petition to permanently stay arbitration and granted the respondent's cross motion to compel arbitration.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner commenced an arbitration proceeding against the respondent, its general contractor on a construction project, in accordance with the terms of the parties' contract, which contained a broad arbitration clause. The respondent appeared in the arbitration and asserted counterclaims, an arbitrator was selected, discovery was conducted, and hearing dates were agreed upon. Thereafter, the petitioner commenced this proceeding to permanently stay the arbitration, contending that it had learned during discovery that the respondent fraudulently misrepresented and/or concealed material facts concerning the scope of the work to be performed pursuant to the contract.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition to permanently stay arbitration and granted the cross motion to compel arbitration. Pursuant to CPLR 7503(b), “a party who has not participated in the arbitration ... may apply to stay arbitration.” The petitioner's initiation of and participation in the arbitration proceeding precludes it from seeking a stay (see N.J.R. Assoc. v. Tausend, 19 N.Y.3d 597, 602, 950 N.Y.S.2d 320, 973 N.E.2d 730 ; Stone v. Noble Constr. Mgt., Inc., 116 A.D.3d 838, 839, 983 N.Y.S.2d 417 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., DICKERSON, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mechtronics Corp. v. Kirchhoff-Consigli Construction Management, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 2, 2016
144 A.D.3d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Mechtronics Corp. v. Kirchhoff-Consigli Construction Management, LLC

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MECHTRONICS CORPORATION, appellant, v. KIRCHHOFF–CONSIGLI…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7195
39 N.Y.S.3d 813

Citing Cases

Vill. of Ossining v. Vill. of Ossining Policemans Benevolent Ass'n

Based on the foregoing participation without objection. Petitioners waived their right to seek a stay of the…