From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mechanic v. Bursztyn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 1996
232 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 31, 1996.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered January 23, 1996, which denied defendants-appellants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Kupferman, JJ.


Summary judgment was properly denied, there being questions of fact whether appellants' nonprofessional employees failed to gather all necessary information relating to plaintiffs MRI test, whether they acted outside the scope of their employment and training by determining what type of MRI scan to perform without prior consultation with the supervising radiologist and whether they provided the interpreting radiologist with all of the information they did have.


Summaries of

Mechanic v. Bursztyn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 1996
232 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Mechanic v. Bursztyn

Case Details

Full title:WILBUR MECHANIC, Respondent, v. ENRIQUE M. BURSZTYN et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 919