From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mech. Mktg. Inc. v. Sixxon Precision Mach. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
CASE NO. CV 11-01844 EJD (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 11-01844 EJD

11-14-2011

MECHANICAL MARKETING, INC., a California Corporation Plaintiff(s), v. SIXXON PRECISION MACHINERY CO., Ltd., TAIWAN, Defendant(s).


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[√] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

[] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) _______________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[√] other requested deadline April 16, 2012

________

Attorney for Plaintiff

________

Attorney for Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

[] Non-binding Arbitration
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
X Mediation
[] Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

[] 90 days from the date of this order.
X other _April 16, 2012
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mech. Mktg. Inc. v. Sixxon Precision Mach. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
CASE NO. CV 11-01844 EJD (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Mech. Mktg. Inc. v. Sixxon Precision Mach. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MECHANICAL MARKETING, INC., a California Corporation Plaintiff(s), v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV 11-01844 EJD (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)