From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meats v. Tandikul

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 23, 2021
21-cv-3072-YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-3072-YGR

09-23-2021

Memphis Meats, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Napat Tandikul, Defendant.


Order Granting Motion of Douglas M. Wade and California Business Lawyer & Corporate Lawyer, Inc. to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant Dkt. No. 39

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Court Judge

The Court has received the supplemental declarations of Douglas M. Wade and Napat Tandikul, as well as the Notice of Napat Tandikul's Current Address. (Dkt. No. 44.) Having reviewed and considered the papers, the Court finds that they comply with the Court's order requiring counsel of record to submit further information regarding the withdrawal of counsel. (Dkt. No. 43.) Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the motion of Douglas M. Wade and California Business Lawyer & Corporate Lawyer, Inc. to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Napat Tandikul effective upon filing proof of service of this Order upon the defendant.

This Order terminates Docket No. 39.

It Is So Ordered.


Summaries of

Meats v. Tandikul

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 23, 2021
21-cv-3072-YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Meats v. Tandikul

Case Details

Full title:Memphis Meats, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Napat Tandikul, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

21-cv-3072-YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)