From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meat Mkt., Inc. v. American Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
Feb 28, 2012
CASE No. 1:11-CV-00983-AWI -DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CASE No. 1:11-CV-00983-AWI -DLB

02-28-2012

THE MEAT MARKET, INC., dba State Center Foods, Plaintiff, v. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

THEODORE W. HOPPE BARBARA J. RUEGER Attorneys for Plaintiff, THE MEAT MARKET, INC. HAGER & DOWLING ALISON M. BERNAL Attorneys for Defendant, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY


JOHN V. HAGER (SBN 61384)

ALISON M. BERNAL (SBN 264629)

HAGER & DOWLING

Attorneys for Defendant, THE

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Hon. Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge; Hon. Dennis L. Beck. Magistrate Judge


STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OF NONDISCLOSURE

AND CONFIDENTIALITY; ORDER

WHEREAS plaintiff to this action, The Meat Market, Inc., wishes to have access to The American Insurance Company's claim manual and other training documents for purposes of prosecuting this lawsuit; and

WHEREAS The American Insurance Company contends its claims manual and related documents contain trade secret privileged information that (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy; and

WHEREAS The American Insurance Company wishes to have access to attorney billing records and fee agreements that purportedly support The Meat Market, Inc.'s claim for attorneys fees; and

WHEREAS The Meat Market contends its attorneys' billing and fee agreement contain attorney-client and/or attorney work product privileged information; and

WHEREAS The American Insurance Company contends that it could suffer irreparable harm if the protected documents or their contents were subjected to unauthorized disclosure, as the documents contain protected information regarding the procedures and training employed by The American Insurance Company; and

WHEREAS The Meat Market and its attorneys contend that they would suffer irreparable harm if the protected documents or their contents were subjected to unauthorized material, as the documents contain privileged information regarding the attorneys' billing .

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows:

1. The protected documents to be produced subject to this protective order shall, prior to being produced by The American Insurance Company, be stamped with a notation on each page thereof stating the following:

PROTECTED DOCUMENT

The Meat Market v. The American Insurance Company, Case No. 1:11-CV-00983-AWI -DLB. This document is subject to a protective order. Unauthorized disclosure is prohibited.

2. Counsel for the parties receiving copies of the protected documents shall treat the documents and their contents as confidential, to be used only for the purposes of this litigation. In particular, counsel shall not give, show or disclose the contents of any such document to any other person or entity except:

(a) the court and its employees under seal, provided however, that no document shall be filed under seal unless the provisions of California Rules of Court, Rules 2.550 to 2.551 have been satisfied;

(b) the parties' counsel of record, including partners and associate attorneys, and paralegal assistants, stenographic and clerical employees when working under the direct supervision of the counsel of record;

(c) the parties' experts, consultants, agents and investigators who are or will be consulted or retained to assist the parties in their preparation for and conduct of pretrial and trial proceedings in this litigation;

(d) court reporters during depositions, hearing or trial.

3. Prior to providing or disclosing protected documents to any person described in subparagraphs 2(b) and/or 2(c), the parties' counsel shall first inform such person that the protected documents are to be treated as confidential, to be used only for purposes of this litigation, and that these restrictions are imposed by court order.

4. Before providing protected documents to any person pursuant to section 2(c), plaintiffs counsel shall first provide such person with a copy of this protective order and have such person execute an acknowledgment and agreement to be bound by the terms of this protective order in the following form:

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT REGARDING


PROTECTED DOCUMENTS


The undersigned acknowledges that a protective order has been entered in United State District Court, Eastern District of California, Court Case No. 1:11-CV-00983-AWI -DLB entitled The Meat Market v. The American Insurance Company. The undersigned acknowledges that he/she/it has received and read a copy of the protective order, understands the contents thereof, and agrees to be bound by its terms. The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the terms of this protective order could subject the undersigned to sanctions or damages as provided by law. The undersigned expressly submits to the jurisdiction of the United State District Court, Eastern District of California for purposes of any action which might be necessary to enforce the terms of this protective order.
DATED: ______ _________
DATED: ______ __________
and retain such signed acknowledgment in its file, pending the final disposition of this action.

5. The disclosure or production by The American Insurance Company of protected documents pursuant to this protective order shall not be deemed to concede the relevancy, competency or admissibility of any document or of any matter set forth therein, and is not intended to be a waiver of any privilege.

6. Any documents stamped as containing any confidential information or any reference thereto, including without limitation all deposition transcripts, document requests and responses thereto, interrogatories, interrogatory answers, other discovery documents, briefs, motions, declarations, and/or points and authorities shall be subject to this protective order and shall not be served on or provided to any person other than the Authorized Parties designated in paragraph 2.

7. Upon request of The American Insurance Company and not later than thirty (30) days following the final disposition of this action, whether by dismissal, settlement, final judgment or otherwise, counsel for all other parties shall deliver to counsel for defendant all copies of the protected documents in their possession or under their control, including copies provided to experts, consultants and any other person described in subparagraphs 2(c). Counsel shall, concurrently with delivery of the protected documents, deliver to defendant's counsel the signed acknowledgments regarding protective order executed per paragraph 3, and shall provide written certificates to defendant's counsel that the terms of the protective order have been complied with by counsel of record by the parties.

HOPPE LAW GROUP

By: _________

THEODORE W. HOPPE

BARBARA J. RUEGER

Attorneys for Plaintiff, THE MEAT

MARKET, INC.

HAGER & DOWLING

By: _________

ALISON M. BERNAL

Attorneys for Defendant, THE AMERICAN

INSURANCE COMPANY

ORDER

On stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the foregoing stipulation is hereby an Order of this Court. However, paragraph 2. (a) shall be modified to read

the court and its employees under seal, provided however, that no document shall be filed under seal unless the provisions of Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California, Rule 141 has been satisfied
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Meat Mkt., Inc. v. American Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
Feb 28, 2012
CASE No. 1:11-CV-00983-AWI -DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Meat Mkt., Inc. v. American Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:THE MEAT MARKET, INC., dba State Center Foods, Plaintiff, v. THE AMERICAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Feb 28, 2012

Citations

CASE No. 1:11-CV-00983-AWI -DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2012)