From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mears Techs., Inc. v. Finisar Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 11, 2017
2016-1485 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 11, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1485 2016-1503

01-11-2017

MEARS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. FINISAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross-Appellant

GEORGE C. SUMMERFIELD, JR., Stadheim & Grear, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KYLE L. HARVEY, ROBERT M. SPALDING, CHRISTOPHER H. ST. PETER, ROLF STADHEIM. DAVID C. RADULESCU, Radulescu LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by ROBIN M. DAVIS, MARIA GRANOVSKY, ETAI LAHAV, TIGRAN VARDANIAN.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:13-cv-00376-JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

JUDGMENT

GEORGE C. SUMMERFIELD, JR., Stadheim & Grear, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KYLE L. HARVEY, ROBERT M. SPALDING, CHRISTOPHER H. ST. PETER, ROLF STADHEIM. DAVID C. RADULESCU, Radulescu LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by ROBIN M. DAVIS, MARIA GRANOVSKY, ETAI LAHAV, TIGRAN VARDANIAN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 11, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Mears Techs., Inc. v. Finisar Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 11, 2017
2016-1485 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Mears Techs., Inc. v. Finisar Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MEARS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. FINISAR CORPORATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 11, 2017

Citations

2016-1485 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 11, 2017)