From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meany v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 8, 2022
No. 33116-21S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 8, 2022)

Opinion

33116-21S

02-08-2022

Laura Marie Meany Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On January 20, 2022, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that petitioners paid the tax liability for tax year 2018 before the issuance of the notice of deficiency, and, therefore, the notice of deficiency is invalid. In his motion to dismiss respondent states that petitioner does not object to the granting of the motion. Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the notice of deficiency is invalid.


Summaries of

Meany v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 8, 2022
No. 33116-21S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Meany v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Laura Marie Meany Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Feb 8, 2022

Citations

No. 33116-21S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 8, 2022)