From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Means v. Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Jul 28, 2009
Case No. 09-C-639 (E.D. Wis. Jul. 28, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 09-C-639.

July 28, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff Means has filed a letter seeking reconsideration of this Court's dismissal of his action on Heck v. Humphrey grounds. The letter argues that he should have been allowed to present evidence and states that he is entitled to be heard and to have counsel appointed.

The request will be denied. The dismissal was not based on the merits of any argument Plaintiff might have but on the procedural basis cited in the dismissal order. Simply put, Plaintiff may not bring a lawsuit for damages or other § 1983 relief until he has first had the decision placing him in custody overturned. In other words, a § 1983 lawsuit in federal court is not the proper forum to hear Plaintiff's dispute at this time.

The request for reconsideration is, therefore, DENIED.


Summaries of

Means v. Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Jul 28, 2009
Case No. 09-C-639 (E.D. Wis. Jul. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Means v. Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:JERRY MEANS, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jul 28, 2009

Citations

Case No. 09-C-639 (E.D. Wis. Jul. 28, 2009)