From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meaney v. Keating

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1952
279 App. Div. 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

April 21, 1952.

Present — Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ. [ 200 Misc. 308.]


In this action to recover damages for personal injuries, appellant, a laborer in the employ of respondent, received severe burns when he left his home in Carle Place, Nassau County, which was across the street from the site of his employment, on a Sunday morning, which was not a workday for him, to enter a small field office on the site of respondent's construction job, because the building was burning and he knew that respondent's watchman was within. Although appellant never presented any notice of claim for compensation payments and did not participate in proceedings before the Workmen's Compensation Board with respect to such payments, he accepted a series of such payments, the aggregate amount of which was equal to the total amount of an award which the said board made for his injuries. The trial court set aside a verdict in favor of appellant and dismissed the complaint, on the ground that respondent's defense of res judicata, based on the said award, had been established as a matter of law, and on the further ground that, in any event, acceptance of the payments constituted an accord and satisfaction. The appeal is from the judgment dismissing the complaint. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Meaney v. Keating

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1952
279 App. Div. 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Meaney v. Keating

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL J. MEANEY, Appellant, v. EDWARD J. KEATING, Doing Business under…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Herman v. Ohrbach's, Inc.

The Special Term held that the above decisions of the board constituted a finding that the injury arose out…

Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.

In our opinion, while the acceptance of compensation payments by plaintiff was not an accord and satisfaction…