From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meakin v. Meakin

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 26, 1972
492 P.2d 1304 (Nev. 1972)

Opinion

No. 6609

January 26, 1972

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; John F. Mendoza, Judge.

George, Steffen Simmons, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

David Canter, of Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


On May 8, 1970, appellant obtained a Nevada divorce which provided, among other things, for child support payments of $750 per month. In January, 1971, our district court, without stating its reasons, denied a motion by appellant for reduction of child support. This appeal follows.

1. Appellant argues our district court's refusal to reduce the child support amounts to an abuse of discretion, contending (a) the deterioration of his health prevents his practice of dentistry, (b) he has had to file bankruptcy, and (c) he is now constrained to work as a hospital orderly earning only $400 per month and thus is unable to meet the $750 monthly child support payments. Except in his brief, the only place in the record where appellant's contentions are found is in his affidavit of December 10, 1970. In Green v. Green, 75 Nev. 317, 340 P.2d 586 (1959), we held that a wife's affidavit which alleged that she had "insufficient funds" was legally insufficient, being a mere conclusion. Appellant's affidavit before us is within our holding in Green.

2. "As appellant has not brought up the hearing transcript [nor a substitute therefor] we must assume the evidence supported the trial court's implicit determinations." Leeming v. Leeming, 87 Nev. 530, 490 P.2d 342 (1971); City of Henderson v. Bentonite, Inc., 87 Nev. 188, 483 P.2d 1299 (1971).

Since the record does not establish that the trial court abused its discretion, the judgment is affirmed.

ZENOFF, C.J., and BATJER, MOWBRAY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meakin v. Meakin

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 26, 1972
492 P.2d 1304 (Nev. 1972)
Case details for

Meakin v. Meakin

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS HARDIE MEAKIN, APPELLANT, v. MARTHA JANIS MEAKIN, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jan 26, 1972

Citations

492 P.2d 1304 (Nev. 1972)
492 P.2d 1304

Citing Cases

Snarr Advertising, Inc. v. Sturgeon

We affirm the order of the district court granting a Rule 41(b) dismissal since the appellant has not…

Shedd v. Adamson

In the absence of a transcript of the testimony taken during the trial below, which would enable this court…