From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meagher v. Osfer Specialty Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

April, 1933.


Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Nothing on the face of the complaint indicates a failure to state a cause of action. Nor is the contention, sought to be supported by affidavit under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, that the cause of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for its commencement, a defense to the present action. If upon the sale a deficiency judgment is had, the collection or enforcement thereof, and to what extent, must be determined in the Surrogate's Court upon an accounting. Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., concurs in result.


Summaries of

Meagher v. Osfer Specialty Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Meagher v. Osfer Specialty Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS H. MEAGHER and HATTIE MEAGHER, His Wife, Respondents, v. OSFER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1933

Citations

239 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)