From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty & Closures, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 25, 2012
2012-1518 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

2012-1518 2012-1527 2012-1528

09-25-2012

MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION AND MEADWESTVACO CALMAR, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. REXAM BEAUTY AND CLOSURES, INC. AND REXAM DISPENSING SYSTEMS S.A.S., Defendants-Appellants, AND VALOIS OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellant, AND VALOIS S.A.S., Defendant.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-0511,

Judge Gerald Bruce Lee.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Upon consideration of MeadWestVaco Corporation's and MeadWestVaco Calmar, Inc.'s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal no. 2012-1528,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss appeal no. 2012-1528 is granted. Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1528.

(2) The revised official caption in 2012-1518, -1527 is reflected above.

For The Court

___________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Adam Phillip Samansky, Esq.

Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Esq.

Gene Stanley Winter, Esq.
s26
Issued As A Mandate (as to 12-1528 only): SEP 25 2012


Summaries of

MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty & Closures, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 25, 2012
2012-1518 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty & Closures, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION AND MEADWESTVACO CALMAR, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

2012-1518 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 25, 2012)