From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meadville City v. Allegheny College

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 29, 1938
131 Pa. Super. 343 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1938)

Opinion

April 14, 1938.

June 29, 1938.

Taxation — Exemption — Schools — Residence of president — Building not on college grounds.

1. A residence of the president of a college owned by the college may be exempt from taxation as property necessary for the occupancy and enjoyment of the college.

2. Such exemption applies even though the building is not annexed or contiguous to the campus or college grounds.

Appeal, No. 238, April T., 1938, from judgment of C.P. Crawford Co., Feb. T., 1937, No. 9, in case of City of Meadville v. Allegheny College.

Before KELLER, P.J., CUNNINGHAM, BALDRIGE, STADTFELD, PARKER and RHODES, JJ. Judgment affirmed.

Proceeding upon writ of scire facias sur municipal tax lien.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Rule for judgment for defendant made absolute, opinion by KENT, P.J. Plaintiff appealed.

Error assigned was action of lower court in making absolute the rule for judgment.

Dickson Andrews, City Solicitor, for appellant.

Frank D. Prather, of Peters Prather, for appellee.


Argued April 14, 1938.


This appeal raises the question whether a dwelling house purchased by Allegheny College as a residence for its president and occupied by him and his family, rent free, as an agreed part of the president's official compensation, is exempt from local taxation, when such residence is located off the main college grounds. The evidence in the case established that the residence off the grounds was purchased following, and because of, the conversion of the President's House, located on the campus grounds, into a dormitory for students.

The court below ruled that it was exempt.

The ruling is sustained by the following decisions of the Supreme Court and this court:

(1) That the college-owned residence of the president is exempt as property necessary for the occupancy and enjoyment of the college, by County of Northampton v. Lafayette College, 128 Pa. 132, 18 A. 516; Dickinson College v. Cumberland County, 12 Pa. C.C.R. 582, cited with approval by the present Chief Justice in Barnes Foundation v. Keely, 314 Pa. 112, 122, 171 A. 267; White v. Smith, 189 Pa. 222, 232, 42 A. 125.

(2) That the exemption applies even though the building is not annexed or contiguous to the campus or college grounds, by Barnes Foundation v. Keely, 314 Pa. 112, 171 A. 267; National Farm School v. Commissioners of Bucks County, 87 Pa. Super. 231; Dickinson College v. Cumberland County, supra, cited on page 122 of Barnes Foundation v. Keely, supra.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Meadville City v. Allegheny College

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 29, 1938
131 Pa. Super. 343 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1938)
Case details for

Meadville City v. Allegheny College

Case Details

Full title:Meadville City, Appellant, v. Allegheny College

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 29, 1938

Citations

131 Pa. Super. 343 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1938)
200 A. 105

Citing Cases

Lewis Clark College v. Commission

Los Angeles County, 35 Cal.2d 755, 221 P.2d 59 (1950) (living quarters for priests in retreat houses);…

Univ. of Pgh. Tax Exemption Case

In the third place, we must apply the well settled rule that findings of fact of a trial judge, confirmed by…