From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meadows v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 10, 2022
No. 09-21-00229-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2022)

Opinion

09-21-00229-CR

01-10-2022

MARCUS NEAL MEADOWS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19-08-10586-CR

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant's counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant's counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of appellant's right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 1

On January 5, 2022, appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the reporter's record and clerk's record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before January 31, 2022. See Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 321-22. 2


Summaries of

Meadows v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 10, 2022
No. 09-21-00229-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Meadows v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS NEAL MEADOWS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jan 10, 2022

Citations

No. 09-21-00229-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2022)