From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meadow Brook National Bank v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 18, 1963
18 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

April 18, 1963


Order, entered on December 11, 1962, denying motion to dismiss complaint and vacate warrant of attachment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order, entered on December 31, 1962, granting motion to punish for contempt for failure to appear for examination in aid of warrant of attachment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied. The examination ordered was of the defendant, purportedly pursuant to section 919 of the Civil Practice Act. This section limits the right of examination to persons referred to in the preceding section, 918. This section refers exclusively to third persons holding property of the defendant and not to defendant himself. It follows that the examination ordered was without authority ( Empire State Collateral Co. v. Cassel Custards, 29 Misc.2d 505).

Concur — Breitel, J.P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Meadow Brook National Bank v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 18, 1963
18 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Meadow Brook National Bank v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:MEADOW BROOK NATIONAL BANK, Respondent, v. SIDNEY MILLER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
239 N.Y.S.2d 493