From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meador v. Wedell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P.

September 20, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On October 29, 2010, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve process upon defendants Bobbola and Wedell in this case. The Marshal was directed to attempt to secure a waiver of service before attempting personal service on defendants. If a waiver of service was not returned within sixty days, the Marshal was directed to effect personal service on the defendants in accordance with the provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), without prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any attempt to secure a waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in effecting personal service.

On July 11, 2011, the United States Marshal filed a return of service with a USM-285 form showing total charges of $81.52 for effecting personal service on defendant Bobbola, and total charges of $81.52 for effecting personal service on defendant Wedell. The form submitted by the United States Marshal shows that a waiver of service form was mailed to both defendants on December 10, 2010, and that no response was received from either defendant.

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service under subdivision (e), (f), or (h) and that receives notice of an action in the manner provided in this paragraph has a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons. . . .
If a defendant located within the United States fails to comply with a request for waiver made by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court shall impose the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on the defendant unless good cause for the failure be shown.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(2).

The court finds that defendants Bobbola and Wedell were given the opportunity required by Rule 4(d)(2) to waive service and failed to comply with the request. Although counsel for defendants filed an answer to the complaint on their behalf on March 15, 2011, and a motion to dismiss and/or in the alternative a motion for summary judgment on April 28, 2011, that did not relieve the defendants from the requirement that they return the signed waiver of service. Consequently, the U.S. Marshall was required to personally served defendants on June 30, 2011, and incurred costs.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within fourteen days from the date of this order defendants Bobbola and Wedell shall each pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $81.52, unless within that time defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service. The court does not intend to extend this fourteen day period.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal.


Summaries of

Meador v. Wedell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Meador v. Wedell

Case Details

Full title:GORDON DALE MEADOR, Plaintiff, v. WEDELL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)