From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meador v. Wedell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P.

September 19, 2011


ORDER


On September 7, 2011, counsel for defendants filed a request for clarification of the court's April 6, 2011 discovery and scheduling order. Specifically, defendants seek clarification of the court's order that requires "[a]ll pre-trial motions, except for motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before September 30, 2011." (Order (Doc. No. 36), ¶ 7 at 6.) Defendants note that on April 28, 2011, they filed a motion to dismiss and/or in the alternative a motion for summary judgment, and ask if "pre-trial motions" include motions in limine.

The court's discovery and scheduling order does not set a deadline for motions in limine. A deadline for the filing of motions in limine, if necessary, will be set in this court's pretrial order. Defendants' motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment is a dispositive motion and was timely filed.

Accordingly, defendants' September 7, 2011 request for clarification (Doc. No. 53) is granted.


Summaries of

Meador v. Wedell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Meador v. Wedell

Case Details

Full title:GORDON DALE MEADOR, Plaintiff, v. WEDELL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0901 KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)