From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meador v. C.S.P. Dental Annex

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. CIV S-10-0860 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0860 MCE EFB P

01-26-2012

WILLIAM L. MEADOR, Plaintiff, v. C.S.P. DENTAL ANNEX, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 13, 2012 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

_________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Meador v. C.S.P. Dental Annex

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. CIV S-10-0860 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Meador v. C.S.P. Dental Annex

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM L. MEADOR, Plaintiff, v. C.S.P. DENTAL ANNEX, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0860 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)