Opinion
21-15368
02-22-2022
ROBERT M. MEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAROLYN INEZ WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellee.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California No. 2:20-cv-00578-DB Deborah L. Barnes, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Robert M. Mead appeals pro se from the district court's order granting defendant's post-judgment motion in Mead's action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In its order, the district court clarified that the parties' state court case, In re Marriage of Mead and Williams-Mead, was not removed to the district court. For the reasons set forth in the district court's order, we affirm.
Mead's motion to recall the mandate in appeal No. 20-17370 and to consolidate that appeal with this appeal is denied.
AFFIRMED.