From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 11, 2001
790 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 4D00-4393

Opinion filed July 11, 2001

Petition for writ of mandamus to Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert R. Makemson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 90-2330 CF.

Paul G. Mead, Punta Gorda, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent.


By petition for writ of mandamus, Paul Mead seeks to compel the trial court to rule on a pending post conviction motion through which he seeks resentencing. His petition attached a copy of the response that the state filed in the trial court on January 12, 1998, in which the state conceded that he was entitled to resentencing. Mead reports that no further action has been taken on his motion.

We grant the petition for writ of mandamus. Mead is entitled to an immediate ruling on his pending motion. If the trial court agrees with the state that resentencing is required, a new sentencing hearing should be held without further delay. We withhold issuance of the writ, being confident that the trial court will rule forthwith on the pending motion and will take such further action as is required in a timely manner.

POLEN, C.J., KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 11, 2001
790 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Mead v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL G. MEAD, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 11, 2001

Citations

790 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)