From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mead v. Louer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 26, 1941
263 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

November 26, 1941.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Schenectady County.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.


The actions were brought to recover damages for personal injuries and damage to property claimed to have been sustained on May 24, 1939, when one of the defendant's trolley cars struck a truck in which plaintiffs were riding at a grade crossing in Saratoga county. The cases were tried in Saratoga county and plaintiffs recovered verdicts which were affirmed by this court ( 260 App. Div. 963) but reversed by the Court of Appeals ( 285 N.Y. 230) and new trials were granted. Thereafter defendant made his motion on the ground that an impartial trial of the actions cannot be had in Saratoga county. The Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion and no proof is presented by appellant to indicate that an impartial trial cannot be had in Saratoga county. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Mead v. Louer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 26, 1941
263 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Mead v. Louer

Case Details

Full title:HARRY MEAD, Respondent, v. ABRAM V. LOUER, as Trustee of SCHENECTADY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1941

Citations

263 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)